COP20—Lima Local weather Convention — World Points

By 3kfdu

February 14, 2024

0

96

[ad_1]

by Anup Shah
This web page Created Saturday, January 24, 2015

This web page: https://www.globalissues.org/article/805/cop20-lima-climate-conference.
To print all data (e.g. expanded aspect notes, exhibits various hyperlinks), use the print model:

On this web page:

Introduction
Assembly consequence
Mainstream media reporting
In context: frequent however differentiated duties
Extra data
Information tales from IPS

Introduction

December 1 – 14, 2014, Lima, Peru was the venue for the twentieth annual United Nations Local weather Change Convention, often known as the twentieth Convention of the Events — or COP 20.

The aim of this convention was to create a common settlement on local weather change motion and start the method of financing mitigation.

Again to prime

Assembly consequence

The assembly ended with all nations agreeing to chop again greenhouse gasoline emissions. Generally known as the Lima Accord, this treaty isn’t legally binding and international locations don’t have to specify how a lot they may in the reduction of, as a substitute agreeing to report their plans again by March 2015.

Whereas for a lot of it gave the impression of a profitable consequence, others have been disillusioned, comparable to poor international locations struggling to rebuild from present impacts of local weather change who have been alarmed on the disappearance of loss and injury commitments from the ultimate textual content which has been a part of the dialogue for years.

The worldwide local weather motion, 350.org, summarized the disappointments and hopeful features of the assembly consequence, noting

The brand new settlement doesn’t mirror the urgency of the local weather disaster
Some good agreements – however no measures to make sure implementation
Least developed and susceptible nations neglected within the chilly
Divestment (from fossil gas reliance) is extra vital than ever
World momentum for actual options is stronger than ever and can carry on going.

In making an attempt to place a optimistic spin on the general disappointment they felt, they concluded, In the long run, a world local weather treaty is only one device to fight local weather change. Actual change goes to proceed to return from the grassroots. The UN Local weather Talks proceed to be a spot the place the world’s international locations comes collectively to debate this disaster and individuals are placing in monumental efforts to ensure Paris [the next global meeting] received’t be like Copenhagen which was filled with disappointments regardless of massive guarantees.

Samantha Smith, Chief of WWF’s World Local weather and Vitality Initiative, was fairly scathing of the assembly consequence saying that political expediency received over scientific urgency. She additionally famous that Developed nation governments couldn’t even handle to clarify how they may ship the long-promised US$100 billion per 12 months in local weather finance by 2020. In a transfer that seemingly dismissed the plight of essentially the most susceptible international locations, they fully eliminated any significant language about ‘loss and injury’.

Again to prime

Mainstream media reporting

As with virtually each earlier assembly (with occasional exceptions), mainstream media reporting was very poor given the significance of this international challenge. The place the assembly was reported it was usually in direction of the top, and simply sound chunk sort summaries saying all international locations agreed to emission cuts and that this was a significant enchancment.

Whereas the treaty continued to say it honors the long-standing frequent however differentiated duties the mainstream media reporting (as in most years) has sometimes failed to offer clarification and context of this precept that has been an vital a part of these talks for over 2 many years; that poor and creating international locations shouldn’t bear the identical duties because the developed ones (as a result of they aren’t the reason for the anthropogenic carbon emissions over the earlier many years which have led to this, which is detailed far more on this website’s web page on local weather justice).

A touch in direction of this precept might have been offered as a viewpoint of China or India, given the impression they’re being obstacles, relatively then explaining this precept in additional context.

That was simply one of many points skirted over or omitted from frequent reporting. Others included points on financing, know-how assist for poorer nations, and so on. Behind the scenes, for many years, wealthy international locations have stalled on these items or actively prevented making an attempt to share know-how and so on, which is barely reported.

Yearly, this criticism is product of mainstream reporting, so with out following these negotiations annually, it may be straightforward to return away with the impression that this assembly had a optimistic consequence.

However as this dialogue hosted by Democracy Now! exhibits, there have been numerous vital problems with competition:

Emissions-Chopping Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014.

Again to prime

In context: frequent however differentiated duties

A few years in the past all nations agreed that local weather change was largely the results of actions from as we speak’s industrialized nations, as carbon dioxide — the principle greenhouse gasoline — stays within the environment for many years. But, the poorest would find yourself struggling essentially the most for an issue they largely didn’t trigger. The approaches to mitigation (emissions discount) would subsequently be completely different for these teams of nations — the frequent however differentiated duties precept.

It’s on this context that the dialogue for loss and injury has come about. And it’s one thing that wealthy international locations are eager to do away with .

The years of resistance on this challenge (and lots of others) means every time it’s mentioned once more the reactions appear to get much more hostile. Mixed with the shortage of detailed context within the mainstream media protection of this side, it then turns into simpler every time to see culprits as China and India given their monumental greenhouse emissions in recent times, in comparison with the far larger quantity by the industrialized nations over the longer interval. See this website’s part on local weather justice for extra detailed background.

And as this website has mentioned for years on the local weather justice web page, the wealthy nations are delaying any significant motion till it’s finally — and disproportionately — paid for the by the creating nations. New Delhi primarily based Nitin Sethi, affiliate editor at Enterprise Commonplace, interviewed within the earlier talked about video says the identical factor, however extra frankly:

There isn’t any motion that’s going to occur between now and 2020. All of that was to be accomplished by the developed international locations. They [rich nations] principally have simply mentioned at Lima that we’re not going to do any greater than what we’re doing to this point, and the burden can shift onto the post-2020 period, the place different creating international locations should share it. So, to me, it signifies actually negotiation in unhealthy religion.

Nitin Sethi, Emissions-Chopping Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Forestall Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014

Again to prime